Visualization works if you work hard. That’s the thing. You can’t just visualize and go eat a sandwich.
– Jim Carrey
I have learned the secret to getting rich in math and science. And now, for the first time ever, I am making these secrets available to you.
I can teach you everything you need to know to debunk Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, and help put you on the fast track to validating your proofs.
With my program, you will literally rewrite the book on formal logic.
Looking to untangle the origins of the universe? No sweat. I will show you how, in just 30 minutes a day, using simple techniques that anyone can learn, you will discover how you can create revolutionary new approaches to thinking about the Big Bang, string theory, and even the nature of God itself. (Did you know, for example, that God is neither a man nor a woman, but made up, in fact, of a fairly inexpensive set of ingredients that can be bought at almost any Italian food store?)
But that’s not all. The normal price of this 24 CD, 2 volume course is $1,999. But if you order now, you will get the entire “MATHEMILLIONS” box set, that’s over 50 hours of groundbreaking material, a signed copy of my new book “Awaken the Giant Mathematician Within”, and I’ll throw in a coupon for 10% off my live, 3-day “1 + 1 = $1,000,000!!11!” bootcamp, a coupon worth over $3000, all for the incredibly low price of $119.95!!!
So don’t wait. This offer can only last a short time. Do me yourself a favour and CALL NOW.
∞
Framed in the context of objective and rational pursuits, the above comes across as obvious drivel. But it’s amazing how much of the multi-billion dollar self-help industry is fueled by offers like these.
This mock sales letter may seem like an exaggeration, but in many ways it is not. If anything, I’ve gone conservative on the markup and punctuation. I only offer two bonus gifts, instead of the usual five or six. My discount may be a little exaggerated, but it is not that far from the truth. And, in the interests of time and space, I’ve kept the length of my sales letter to a mere fraction of the real spiel.
But the purpose of this article is not to rant about sales letters. I think most people can detect an infomercial when they see one. Instead, the purpose of this article is to declare war on the false premise that motivates people to write sales letters, the same belief that can undermine your efforts in the pursuit of happiness: The idea that there’s a secret to creating the life you want, and that some random person you’d never heard of until now can offer it to you at an unbeatable low price.
The Key(words) to Success
In no other realm of human endeavour are we so focussed on hugely unrealistic metrics as in the realm of personal growth. Here, for example, are the results of a keyword search I did in the self-help section of Amazon. The number in parentheses represents the number of matches as a percentage of the total number of items in that category:
- Secret: 21,287 matches (20.5%)
- Million: 18,223 matches (17.6%)
- Instant: 13,998 matches (13.5%)
- Unlimited: 7,727 matches (7.5%)
- Effortless: 3,620 matches (3.5%)
Compare that with, say, the Computer and Internet section. There are three times as many books in this section, so the most useful comparison is by percentages:
- Million: 30,939 matches (8.0%)
- Instant: 25,469 matches (6.6%)
- Secret: 23,602 matches (6.1%)
- Unlimited: 19,117 matches (4.9%)
- Effortless: 2,246 matches (0.6%)
In the vocabulary of false promises, self-help books dominate the competition. And while the statistical difference here is large, the cultural difference between these two worlds is even larger. Whereas books that offer instant results (”Learn Java in 24 Hours”) and “secrets” are generally laughed at in computer circles, they take center stage in the world of self-improvement.
In fact, one of the most popular self-help titles of all-time is called The Secret.
Fantasy Positions
My favourite chess book ever is Jeremy Silman’s How to Reassess Your Chess
. One of the insights that stuck with me most from that book was the use of “fantasy positions.”
The idea was that you learned a set of principles for evaluating a chess position, and then you used them to imagine the ideal position you wanted to create on the board. The key was to forget about what it took to get there at first, and focus exclusively on the desired outcome. From there, you looked for moves in the current position that brought you closer to the fantasy position. Lather, rinse, repeat until you found a feasible course of action.
This technique was a great way of approaching chess strategy for me. I’d never quite thought in terms of fantasy positions before, and doing so gave me a much clearer sense of what I was doing. Of course, the fantasy position is just another name for visualization applied to chess.
The fantasy position, in other words, is chess’s version of The Secret.
Ask, Believe, FAIL
In the chess world–and this is true of most fields of human knowledge–there are some manuals written to teach you some things, and other manuals written to teach you other things. While I was blown away by how useful it was to think in terms of fantasy positions, I didn’t for a second think that this was the key that could unlock my potential as a chess player. I knew there were still hundreds of volumes of chess wisdom out there for me to consume–so many nuances of opening, middlegame, and endgame theory–and thousands of games yet to be played and analyzed before I would have any hope of being really good.
Visualizing was a nice little tool, but only a tiny part of the overall arsenal I needed to win.
But in the self-help industry, visualization is presented as decisive, a “key to success.” In fact, a search for “visualize” in Amazon’s self-help section turns up 9,170 matches, which is 8.8% of everything in that category, or more than double the total number of chess items for sale.
The self-help form of visualization takes on an entirely new dimension, and an entirely new name: The Law of Attraction. And the Law states that all you need to do is place your order with the universe and the universe will respond.
Back to Reality
If you’re not careful, the vastly overstated claims of self-help literature can make you feel ripped off, and even downright cynical about personal change. After all, if you were one of the many people who spent hundreds of dollars on a course that claimed it would triple your reading speed, but it made no difference at all, how could you not feel let down?
In the case of someone trying to start a business, whose 30 minutes a day doesn’t *gasp* turn into a million dollar company, the worst that happens is they keep their day job. A tad unfortunate to see all that effort wasted, but not the end of the world. But the consequences of deception can get much worse than that. For someone trying to, say, quit drinking, following a trail of false hope can lead to disaster.
As the chess example shows, a good way to gain perspective on the strange and sometimes mystical advice of self-help authors is to frame those ideas, where possible, in terms of something concrete and familiar and see how they measure up. I’ve found this to be an effective way to manage my expectations.
The other thing I do is follow a simple rule of thumb: Don’t read stuff by people who got successful by telling other people how to be successful. This is especially true when I can find no other evidence of their past achievements in the real world. There are just too many insanely smart people out there, whose claims are supported by reasoned argument and scientific evidence to waste a single minute on stuff that isn’t.
I haven’t always followed this rule, but since I have I’ve been able to fully engage with what I read. No more having to ask myself why an author would include a well-known email chain letter at the end of his book and claim it was written to him by a dying young girl, or wondering why I can find no trace of their history on Google outside of their promotional campaign.
These ideas are both pretty common sense, but not always common practice. It’s so easy to start out with a genuine desire to live a better life, and end up confused and disappointed when met with the junk science (Law of Attraction, NLP, “Power of the Subconscious Mind”, etc.) and made-up anecdotes (Yale Goals Study, claims of winning some world championship somewhere that no one is able to verify) that are so painfully common to self-help literature.
If you want to improve the quality of your life, self-help is the wrong route to take. But the growth mindset itself is vital. Things like visualization, gratitude, early rising, and all those fuzzy things are truly wonderful ideas. They do work well. But even if you add them all together and multiply by 42, you still won’t find the key to success.
Oh, BTW, Hi
Speaking of personal growth, welcome to my blog. It’s been a while. You might not remember me. Brad?…Ring any bells?
My life has changed a lot in the last few months and, in case this article (and this article) hasn’t made it clear enough, so to has my take on the art of living. I am writing to you no longer from Montreal, but from Berlin. I will soon be on my way to Vancouver. And I recently became the world’s most eligible bachelor.
I’ve made a lot of useful mistakes since we we last spoke. But I’ll save those stories for future posts. In the meantime, it’s a pleasure to be writing to you again. It’s good to be home.
Excellent article and very good points!
‘The Secret’? My ass!
thank you for sharing//
I’m looking forward to these future posts you speak of…
yes! my favorite blogger returns…and this is an awesome post…thanks a ton for that brad. This post sort of sums up what I’ve been thinking a lot over the past couple months. The law of attraction seemed so…attractive to me that I think that I wanted to accept it, but then my reasoning began to take on this form.
Great observation about the oversimplification of success. For instance, in a 25-mile marathon, people rarely quit in the last quarter mile largely because (one could conjecture) the finish line is right there–clear as day. But if all you did was visualize the finish line, you didn’t train, you didn’t eat right, you dramatically lower your chances for completing the marathon. Completing a marathon takes a lot more than simply visualizing your finishing it.
Thanks for your comments guys. Good to see some familiar names again. :)
@NewWorldOrder:
That’s a good analogy. Another great example of how bringing the ideas in self-help books to bear on situations where people already intuitively employ them makes it easy to see that they’re useful skills, but hardly miraculous.
Great post! I agree with you on that people too often get too easily caught up in the promise of an easy way out: just one more book, one more CD, one more program…
but at the same time, I think you are underestimating the power of the subconscious mind. I just dont think people really understand how to use that power..
@Vessi:
Thanks for your comment.
I totally agree that our understanding there is poor. Yet if you search self-help on Amazon for “subconscious”, you get 7,405 examples of people who are more than ready to fill in those blanks. To me, at least, that’s bilious.
Great surprise to read you again, your article made my day.
What you wrote make me remember about buddhism. Many people look for an answer in buddhism, a magical enlightenmment that make them better human beings, as claim the self-help books. But as you know buddhism don’t offer that secret key.
A famous buddhist koan illustrates this:
A monk asked Zhaozhou to teach him. Zhaozhou asked, “Have you eaten your meal?”
The monk replied, “Yes, I have.”
“Then go wash your bowl”, said Zhaozhou.
At that moment, the monk was enlightened.
I think there IS a secret sauce: it’s personal development itself. It sounds trivial, but consider that most people don’t even think about self-growth at a conscious level. If I didn’t find say stevepavlina.com and fastseduction.com 3 years ago my life would have been VERY different, I can tell you that. Of course, I’ve read tons of materials since then, so the secret is really to awaken to personal development and keep reading.
@Andre:
Thanks for your kind words. Good point about buddhism too. Religious teachers were the earliest pioneers in the field of false promises. :)
Are you French-Canadian btw?
Will you be back to a steady posting schedule now? You, Tim Ferriss, Scott Young and Steve Pavlina = best PD blogs IMHO.
@Reader in Sweden:
Thanks for joining the discussion.
It sounds like we’re on the same page. When I say that “the growth mindset itself is vital”, I’m pretty sure I’m saying the same thing as you about being conscious of where you’re at and where you’re headed.
My argument here is that if you’re in that state of mind, you can do much better than self-help books to move forward–philosophy, psychology, and authors like Dan Gilbert, Sonja Lyubomirsky, and John Gottman, who actually include research to back up their claims, are just a few examples that come to mind.
To answer your other two questions: 1. No, I am an Anglo-Canadian who learned French fluently after living in Quebec for six years, and 2. I’d prefer to not make predictions. I have to let my publishing button speak for itself. :)
It sounds like we’re on the same page. When I say that “the growth mindset itself is vital”, I’m pretty sure I’m saying the same thing as you about being conscious of where you’re at and where you’re headed.
Indeed. I hadn’t read the entire post when I commented.
My argument here is that if you’re in that state of mind, you can do much better than self-help books to move forward–philosophy, psychology, and authors like Dan Gilbert, Sonja Lyubomirsky, and John Gottman, who actually include research to back up their claims, are just a few examples that come to mind.
Research-backed PD is something I’ve been interested in for a while. Care to elaborate?
Also, check out lesswrong.com, they’re written a lot of stuff on akrasia, mental biases/heuristics and bayesian decision theories.
The drawback to science is of course that one is a bit conservative, and some thing one never tests because they’re by nature unscientific. Stuff like LOA (which I happen to find very useful) obviously falls in this category. But I like to think that there can be room for both science and some more mystical/woo-woo things…
Please post more on Canada! I’ve really taken a liking to the country lately, want to go there when I can.
Do you like Trailer Park Boys? :)
Also, check out the Canadian writer/radio host/crazy guy Sean Kennedy. I recommend his “TV” show Patrolling and his weekly news broadcast called Newsreal: http://www.rantmedia.ca/
Lastly, what projects are you working on ATM? Where are you headed in the future? Anything exciting? :)
@Reader in Sweden:
If you want to know more about the research, Google those authors and read their books (Stumbling on Happiness, The How of Happiness, Gottman’s couples experiments in the “Love Lab”). You will *taste* the difference! :)
The answers to your other questions would be a little off-topic to this discussion, but if you’re curious about what I get up to day-to-day, you might consider following my Twitter feed:
http://twitter.com/30sleeps
Stumbling on happiness is actually on my to read list, I will bump it up now that you recommend it.
Another objection to science would be the limited usefulness of some findings. Take studies on protein or creatine or whatever, they’re usually done on untrained athletes and they test the strength with some pretty bad metrics (ie biceps curl machine or somesuch), instead of doing a study on experienced powerlifters/bodybuilders and testing on squats or deadlifts, which might give you completely different results. Same with psych studies, they might tell me I have so and so chance of being happier if I dine with friends 3 times a week or get a pet, but the granularity of usefulness is pretty low. In order to implement my own personal plan for world domination, I have to experiment on myself and do a lot of stuff that might not be all that scientific. I guess I am a bit of a mad/fringe scientist, and this is why I’ve always been attracted to disciplines such as PU or BB, where you’re always stretching the science and often you’re on your own in no man’s land and testing out stuff based on someone’s anecdotal evidence. Abductive reasoning ftw ;)
Sorry for rambling :)
Oh, I am reading Awaken the giant within ATM and I actually find it quite good. So there! ;)
Which book was it and which author claimed a dying kid wrote something that is from a chain letter? David L. Weatherford a chaild psychologist wrote the “Slow Dance” poem but never meant for it to be ripped off and used in a dying kid hoax. Sally Meyr, I think her names, wrote the “Spending The Day” poem as a tribute for her son when he was diagnosed with autism at 2. But wouldn’t it be a laugh if that book “The Secret” actually contained something from a chain letter of all things?
sup Brad,
welcome back :p
I nearly panicked after reading your first paragraph before I realised you were just framing your post.
Your post reminds me of a lesson my dad often told me, ‘just because you read something, doesn’t mean it’s true’
@Indy:
The 4-Hour Workweek, by Tim Ferriss.
@jackmo:
Indeed. (A rule, BTW, which applies to this blog as much as anything else. :)
@Brad: I second Reader in Sweeden on lesswrong.com, but I also recommend the writings of Robin Hanson on its sister site, overcomingbias.com. He writes about rationality and self-deception, usually in the larger context of society, but it definitely has bearing on the individual as well.
Good to see you writing again!
@Oliver: I love lesswrong’s tagline: “a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality.” Subscribed! OB looks awesome too. Thanks for mentioning them guys.
Brad, welcome back. I always find your posts stimulating and inspiring.
Damn. I thought I was the world’s most eligible bachelor. ha!
Cheers.
Welcome back Brad! Glad to read you again :)
Oh, BTW, I’m not the only one that does consider “the secret” as non-sense! Weee!
Brad,
Another excellent article. Thanks for sharing this.
Vineet
Good your back, have not checked this site in a while. I agree with you that the “Law of Attraction” is just a scam.
Hi Brad!
I think your site is great. Your writing is clear and simple. Reading your site inspires me to improve my life and makes me think that it really is possible! So thanks for that!
Having said that, I thought that this particular entry could have been clearer on what your main point is. When I finished reading it, I did think to myself: wait… what was his point? I THINK your point was: “Try personal development products which have good evidence backing them.” Am I right in thinking this?
Anyway, I wondered if you’d heard of or read a book called “The Happiness Trap” by Russ Harris. I am reading it at the moment and I think it’s great. It has good scientific evidence behind it. I thought I’d recommend it to you.
Thanks again for your site!
http://www.clickhereyouidiot.com <<< Brilliant site, showing how people sell utter crap!! Great blog!